Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

Northern America United States

Alabama

The Guttmacher Institute collects state-level data on publicly funded family planning services, unintended and teen pregnancy, and abortion. The Institute also tracks and analyzes state policies regarding abortion rights and access, minors’ access to services, funding for contraceptive services, sex and HIV education, and other topics related to sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Select a state

  • Fact Sheet

    State Facts About Abortion

  • map of United States

    State Policy Resources

  • Fact Sheet

    State Facts About Unintended Pregnancy

Top Facts & Statistics

  • 24

    states (and DC) mandate sex education in schools
  • 38%

    of women 13–44 live in a state supportive of abortion rights
  • 13.9%

    of women aged 15-44 were uninsured in 2014

Resources

  • October 2017 News Release

    Overall Contraceptive Use in the United States Remained Steady from 2008 to 2014

    United States

    • Contraception
  • October 2017 Research Article

    Contraceptive method use in the United States: Trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014

    Megan L. Kavanaugh and Jenna Jerman,Contraception

    United States

    • Contraception
  • October 2017 Policy Analysis

    Efforts to Transform the Nature of Medicaid Could Undermine Access to Reproductive Health Care

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
    • HIV & STIs
    • Pregnancy
  • October 2017 News Release

    Although Many U.S. Women of Reproductive Age Live Close to an Abortion Clinic, A Substantial Minority Would Need to Travel Far to Access Services

    United States

    • Abortion
  • October 2017 Research Article

    Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis

    Jonathan Bearak, Kristen Burke and Rachel K. Jones,The Lancet Public Health

    United States

    • Abortion
  • October 2017 Infographic

    How far would U.S. women need to travel to access abortion?

    United States

    • Abortion
  • October 2017 Policy Analysis

    Postabortion Contraception: Emerging Opportunities and Barriers

    Megan K. Donovan,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
    • Pregnancy
  • September 2017 Blog / Letter / Op-ed

    Congress Should Oppose the 20-Week Abortion Ban

    Heather D. Boonstra,The Hill

    United States

    • Abortion
  • September 2017 Blog / Letter / Op-ed

    Graham-Cassidy Continues Efforts To Bar Private Insurance Coverage Of Abortion

    Adam Sonfield,Health Affairs Blog

    United States

    • Abortion
  • September 2017 Report

    Pregnancies, Births and Abortions Among Adolescents and Young Women in the United States, 2013: National and State Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity

    Kathryn Kost, Isaac Maddow-Zimet and Alex Arpaia

    United States

    • Teens

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
Explore the Data Center

Hear From An Expert

Allowing medical providers to treat a patient’s partner for an STI without having the partner present can break the cycle of reinfection and greatly improve a patient’s reproductive health

Elizabeth Nash

Principal Policy Associate, State Issues
View State Policy Updates
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2022 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates