Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

United States Contraception

Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Changes to the health care system under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are having wide-ranging impacts on health coverage and provision of care to men and women across the United States. Guttmacher studies the ACA’s impact on reproductive health coverage and access, with a particular focus on the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee, which has eliminated cost barriers that could impede women’s ability to obtain the method that is best for them. The Institute also focuses on identifying vulnerable populations, such as many immigrants, who are not fully benefiting from the ACA.

  • Affordable Care Act (ACA)
  • Publicly Funded Family Planning
  • State Policies on Contraception
  • Policy Analysis

    The First 10 Years of the ACA: We Must Protect and Build on Major Gains in Sexual and Reproductive Health

  • Blog / Letter / Op-ed

    U.S. Insurance Coverage, 2018: The Affordable Care Act Is Still Under Threat and Still Vital for Reproductive-Age Women

  • Policy Analysis

    The ACA’s Birth Control Benefit Is Back Before the Supreme Court

Top Facts & Statistics

  • 20%

    decrease in women living below the poverty line who were uninsured between 2013 and 2014
  • 15-67%

    increase in women paying zero dollars out of pocket for oral contraceptive pills between fall 2012 and spring 2014.
  • 87%

    of insured women did not have to pay out of pocket for a hormonal IUD by spring 2014

Resources

  • March 2016 Policy Analysis

    New Clarity for the U.S. Abortion Debate: A Steep Drop in Unintended Pregnancy Is Driving Recent Abortion Declines

    Joerg Dreweke,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
    • Pregnancy
    • Teens
  • March 2016 News Release

    Steep Drop in Unintended Pregnancy Is Behind the 2008–2011 U.S. Abortion Decline

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
    • Pregnancy
  • February 2016 News in Context

    Health Coverage Trends Among U.S. Women of Reproductive Age Varied Considerably with ACA Implementation

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
    • Pregnancy
  • February 2016 Policy Analysis

    Guttmacher Institute Amicus Brief Filed With the Supreme Court of the United States: Zubik vs. Burwell

    United States

    • Contraception
  • February 2016 News in Context

    Putting Data Front and Center in Contraceptive Coverage Supreme Court Case

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
    • HIV & STIs
    • Pregnancy
  • February 2016 Policy Analysis

    Addressing Challenges to Implementation of the Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee of the Affordable Care Act

    Adam Sonfield,Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

    United States

    • Contraception
  • January 2016 Policy Analysis

    Health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age before and after implementation of the affordable care act

    Adam Sonfield and Rachel K. Jones,Contraception

    United States

    • Contraception
  • Immigrant women need health coverage, not legal barriers
    January 2016 Infographic

    Immigrant women need health coverage, not legal barriers

    United States

    • Contraception
  • January 2016 Policy Analysis

    Learning from Experience: Where Religious Liberty Meets Reproductive Rights

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Abortion
    • Contraception
  • November 2015 Research Article

    Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among United States women, 2009-2012

    Megan L. Kavanaugh, Jenna Jerman and Lawrence B. Finer,Obstetrics & Gynecology

    United States

    • Contraception
    • Pregnancy
    • Teens

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
Explore the Data Center

Hear From An Expert

Providers who participated in a recent study suggested that having insurance coverage or other supplemental funding available for long-acting reversible contraceptive method services that covers not just the cost of the method, but also training for staff and counseling for younger clients, would help clinics to better meet their clients’ contraceptive needs

Megan L. Kavanaugh

Principal Research Scientist

Select a state

View State Policy Updates
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2022 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates