Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade in Peril
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

United States

Contraception

When women and their partners have access to a wide range of contraceptive methods, they are better able to plan and space their births. This leads to positive health, social and economic outcomes for women, families and society. The Guttmacher Institute documents the need for, access to and use of contraceptives and provides the evidence base for public investment in high-quality and affordable family planning services that provide a full range of methods, comprehensive and accurate information, and effective counseling.

  • Affordable Care Act (ACA)
  • Publicly Funded Family Planning
  • State Policies on Contraception
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study

  • Fact Sheet

    Contraceptive Use in the United States by Demographics

  • Policy Analysis

    What Federal Policymakers Must Do to Restore and Strengthen a Title X Family Planning Program That Serves All

Top Facts & Statistics

  • 2-12%

    increase in contraceptive users who relied on a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method between 2002 and 2012
  • 99%

    of sexually active American women 15–44 have used a contraceptive method other than natural family planning
  • 30

    years the average U.S. woman uses contraceptives to attain her family planning goal of two children

Resources

  • March 2012 Policy Analysis

    Federal Contraceptive Coverage Requirement Emerges as Major Political Issue, Despite Accommodation for Religiously Affiliated Employers

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
  • March 2012 Policy Analysis

    Medicaid Drives Upward Trend in Public Funding for Family Planning Services

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
  • March 2012 Report

    Health Information Technology and Publicly Funded Family Planning Agencies: Readiness, Use and Challenges

    Jennifer J. Frost, Jenna Jerman and Adam Sonfield

    United States

    • Contraception
  • February 2012 Policy Analysis

    The Religious Exemption to Mandated Insurance Coverage of Contraception

    Adam Sonfield,Virtual Mentor

    United States

    • Contraception
  • December 2011 Blog / Letter / Op-ed

    The Decision on the Morning-After Pill

    Lawrence B. Finer,New York Times

    United States

    • Contraception
  • November 2011 Report

    Beyond Birth Control: The Overlooked Benefits Of Oral Contraceptive Pills

    Rachel K. Jones

    United States

    • Contraception
  • November 2011 Policy Analysis

    Medicaid Remains Crucial for Reproductive-Age Women–and Also a Target for Budget Cuts

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
  • November 2011 Policy Analysis

    Implementing the Affordable Care Act: Enrollment Strategies and the U.S. Family Planning Effort

    Adam Sonfield,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
  • November 2011 Policy Analysis

    Medicaid Family Planning Expansions Approved in Ohio, Maryland

    Rachel Benson Gold,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception
  • November 2011 Policy Analysis

    Strengthening the Safety Net: Pathways for Collaboration Between Community Health Centers and Family Planning Programs

    Rachel Benson Gold,Guttmacher Policy Review

    United States

    • Contraception

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • …
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • next ›
  • last »
Explore the Data Center

Hear From An Expert

There are more than 60 million women of reproductive age in the United States, and virtually all of them, regardless of religious affiliation, will use a modern contraceptive method in their lives.

Rachel K. Jones

Principal Research Scientist

Select a state

View State Policy Updates
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2022 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates